The Significance of Budget Cuts

The Significance of Budget Cuts

It’s been a third decade when Americans witnessed economic success with the prism of cooked books and lofty promises – $85 billion in abrupt budget cuts would be an uncouth arising.

The government owes $16.5 trillion, borrows another $1 trillion each year and must satisfy the will of voting populace intent on receiving $1.8 trillion in annual tax breaks for buying a house, medical insurance or saving for retirement.

There is, however, a silver lining to it all: Americans might rediscover the things that really matter in life.

Marketing like television ads, shopping malls and product placement defined the success; credit cards only allowed people to buy it. Sure enough, consumer debt as a percent of disposable income jumped by 75 percent from 1980 to 2010, just as the economy became increasingly addicted to consumer spending, growing from 62.5 percent of GDP to 70 percent during the same period.

Despite being the richest nation on earth, the United States is also the most anxious, with nearly a third of Americans likely to suffer from an anxiety problem in their lifetime. If one were to ask patients with a terminal illness what they regret not doing, it’s doubtful that anyone would mention a bigger house, a nicer car or a walk-in closet. With few exceptions, the luxury cars don’t make them happy; it’s the person in the passenger seat.



In some ways the Congress has the difficult task of tempering material expectations without dampening the will to be great, to be responsible and to build something for their children at the expense of themselves. What a delicate balance to maintain, to foster innovation and full employment while also satisfying debts accumulated over the last five administrations.

These things are imminently possible. Domestic industries are destined to evolve and workers will become better trained, but it takes time and it requires patience and it demands sacrifice and it means that some will not have as much stuff in the meantime. Petulant free market panderers may argue in favor of laissez faire economics, noting its many favorable qualities, but if capitalism were more than just a caricature of itself people wouldn’t be so concerned about these budget cuts in the first place.

Prehistoric humans lived shorter lives in part because younger generations, in dire need of shelter and lacking the requisite knowledge to build a house, ultimately displaced their elders. The American taxpayer, having demanded its cake and austerity measures too, is once again faced with a scripted day of reckoning.

Comments are closed.